UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Tradeweb Markets Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Dear Stockholder,

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Tradeweb Markets Inc. which will be held virtually at 12:15 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TW2021.

The attached Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describes the formal business that we will transact at the virtual Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors of Tradeweb Markets Inc. has determined that an affirmative vote on each matter that calls for an affirmative vote is in the best interest of Tradeweb Markets Inc. and its stockholders and unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” all such matters considered at the Annual Meeting.

We have elected to take advantage of the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that allow us to furnish our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), rather than a full paper set of the proxy materials, unless you previously requested to receive printed copies. The Notice contains details regarding the date, time and location of the meeting and the business to be conducted, as well as instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet and for voting over the Internet.

Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares promptly by following the voting instructions that you have received. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Voting by proxy will not prevent you from voting virtually at the Annual Meeting, but will assure that your vote is counted if you cannot virtually attend.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and the employees of Tradeweb Markets Inc., we thank you for your continued support and look forward to seeing you at the virtual Annual Meeting.

Sincerely yours,

Lee Olesky

Chief Executive Officer and Director

March 30, 2021

Notice of 2021 Virtual

Annual Meeting of

Stockholders

The 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Tradeweb Markets Inc. (“Tradeweb” or the “Company”) will be held virtually at 12:15 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TW2021 for the following purposes:

Our Board of Directors recommends you vote (i) “FOR” the election of each of the nominees to the Board of Directors; (ii) “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm; (iii) “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and (iv) “Three Year” for the frequency with which stockholders of the Company shall be entitled to have an advisory vote on executive compensation.

The Board of Directors has fixed March 15, 2021 as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the virtual Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the virtual Annual Meeting.

The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual meeting” of stockholders. You are invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. However, you do not need to virtually attend the meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card if you received paper copies of the proxy materials, or follow the instructions below to submit your proxy over the Internet.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Douglas Friedman

General Counsel and Secretary

New York, New York

March 30, 2021

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Tradeweb Markets Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders To Be Held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021

This Notice, our Proxy Statement, and our combined Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 are available at www.proxyvote.com.

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Tradeweb Markets Inc. (“Tradeweb” or the “Company”) is providing the Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this Proxy Statement and proxy card in connection with the Company’s solicitation of proxies for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held virtually at 12:15 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TW2021 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

This proxy summary highlights information contained elsewhere in our Proxy Statement. The summary does not contain all the information that you should consider, and we encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement carefully.

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

Tradeweb Markets Inc.

Proxy Statement

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Tradeweb Markets Inc. (“Tradeweb” or the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held virtually at 12:15 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TW2021 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Our principal offices are located at 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. This Proxy Statement is first being made available to our stockholders on or about March 30, 2021. The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual meeting” of stockholders. You are invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. However, you do not need to virtually attend the meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card if you received paper copies of the proxy materials, or follow the instructions below to submit your proxy over the Internet.

Outstanding Securities and Quorum

Only holders of record of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock (each such designation having par value $0.00001 per share) at the close of business on March 15, 2021, the record date, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On that date, we had 104,148,335 shares of Class A common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, 96,933,192 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, 1,654,825 shares of Class C common stock outstanding and entitled to vote and 28,877,108 shares of Class D common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Holders of outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock vote together as a single class on all matters on which stockholders are entitled to vote generally (except as may be required by law).

Each share of Class A common stock and Class C common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters presented to the Company’s stockholders generally. Each share of Class B common stock and Class D common stock entitles its holder to ten votes on all matters presented to the Company’s stockholders generally. The holders of Class C common stock and Class D common stock have no economic interests in the Company (where “economic interests” means the right to receive any dividends or distributions, whether cash or stock, in connection with common stock). These attributes are summarized in the following table:

All of the shares of our outstanding Class B common stock are currently held by an indirect subsidiary (the “Refinitiv Direct Owner”) of Refinitiv Parent Limited (“Refinitiv”). Until January 29, 2021, Refinitiv was indirectly controlled by (i) certain investment funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. (f/k/a The Blackstone Group L.P.) (“Blackstone”), (ii) an affiliate of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, (iii) an

affiliate of GIC Special Investments Pte. Ltd. and (iv) certain co-investors (collectively, the “Investor Group”), which collectively indirectly held a 55% ownership interest in Refinitiv, and Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”), which indirectly held a 45% ownership interest in Refinitiv. On January 29, 2021, the London Stock Exchange Group plc (“LSEG”) closed a transaction with the Investor Group and Thomson Reuters to acquire the Refinitiv business. Following the consummation of such transaction, LSEG became the controlling shareholder of Refinitiv, and Refinitiv continues to be the controlling shareholder of Tradeweb, holding approximately 87.9% of the combined voting power of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock. LSEG has advised us that it intends to vote all such shares for the election of each of the nominees to the Board named herein, the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, the non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and the non-binding resolution to approve a Three Year frequency with which stockholders of the Company shall be entitled to have an advisory vote on executive compensation.

A majority of the voting power of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and Class D common stock entitled to vote, present virtually or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

We are furnishing proxy materials to some of our stockholders via the Internet by mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials directs stockholders to a website where they can access our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our combined Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “2020 Annual Report”), and view instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and would prefer to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you elect to receive our future proxy materials electronically, you will receive access to those materials via e-mail unless and until you elect otherwise.

Proxy Voting

Shares that are properly voted via the Internet or by telephone or for which proxy cards are properly executed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given or, in the absence of directions, will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows: “FOR” the election of each of the nominees to the Board named herein, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and “Three Year” for the frequency with which stockholders of the Company shall be entitled to have an advisory vote on executive compensation. It is not expected that any additional matters will be brought before the Annual Meeting, but if other matters are properly presented, the persons named as proxies in the proxy card or their substitutes will vote in their discretion on such matters.

The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your shares are held. If you own shares of record, meaning that your shares are represented by certificates or book entries in your name so that you appear as a stockholder on the records of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (“AST”), our stock transfer agent, you may vote by proxy, meaning you authorize individuals named in the proxy card to vote your shares. You may provide this authorization by voting via the Internet, by telephone or (if you have received paper copies of our proxy materials) by returning a proxy card. In these circumstances, if you do not vote by proxy or virtually at the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted. If you own shares in street name, meaning that your shares are held by a bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee, you may instruct that

institution on how to vote your shares. You may provide these instructions by voting via the Internet, by telephone, or (if you have received paper copies of proxy materials through your bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee) by returning a voting instruction form received from that institution. In these circumstances, if you do not provide voting instructions, the institution may nevertheless vote your shares on your behalf with respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, but cannot vote your shares on any other matters being considered at the Annual Meeting.

Voting Standard

With respect to the election of directors (Item 1), a nominee for director shall be elected to the Board by a plurality of the votes cast in respect of the shares of common stock present virtually or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. A plurality vote requirement means that the director nominees with the greatest number of votes cast, even if less than a majority, will be elected. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” with respect to each nominee. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote with respect to the nominee from which they are withheld and will have the same effect as abstentions. Withhold votes, abstentions, and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election. Broker non-votes occur when a person holding shares in street name, such as through a brokerage firm, does not provide instructions as to how to vote those shares and the broker lacks the authority to vote uninstructed shares at its discretion. Under current Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) interpretations that govern broker non-votes, Item 1, Item 3 and Item 4 are considered non-discretionary matters, and a broker will lack the authority to vote uninstructed shares at its discretion on such proposal. Item 2 is considered a discretionary matter, and a broker will be permitted to exercise its discretion to vote uninstructed shares on the proposal.

With respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 (Item 2), the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of common stock present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve the matter. With respect to Item 2 you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN”. For this matter, abstentions are not counted as affirmative votes on a matter but are counted as present at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote and will have the effect of a vote “against” the matter, and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of these matters.

With respect to the advisory vote on executive compensation (Item 3), the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of common stock present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to approve the matter. With respect to Item 3 you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN”. For this matter, abstentions are not counted as affirmative votes on a matter but are counted as present at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote and will have the effect of a vote “against” the matter.

With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Item 4), your vote may be cast for “1 YEAR,” “2 YEAR” “3 YEAR” frequency or “ABSTAIN.” A vote to “ABSTAIN” will have no effect on the vote. The choice receiving the most votes cast by stockholders present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by the stockholders.

Voting via the Internet or by telephone helps save money by reducing postage and proxy tabulation costs.

We encourage you to register to receive all future stockholder communications electronically, instead of in print. This means that, after you register, access to the 2020 Annual Report, proxy statement, and other correspondence will be delivered to you via e-mail.

Voting and Attendance at the Annual Meeting

If you own common stock of record, you may virtually attend the Annual Meeting and vote virtually, regardless of whether you have previously voted by proxy card, via the Internet, or by telephone. If you own common stock in street name, you may virtually attend the Annual Meeting, but in order to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting you must obtain a “legal proxy” from the bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee that holds your shares. You should contact your bank or brokerage account representative to learn how to obtain a legal proxy. We encourage you to vote your shares in advance of the Annual Meeting by one of the methods described above, even if you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting. If you have already voted prior to the Annual Meeting, you may nevertheless change or revoke your vote at the Annual Meeting as described below. Only stockholders as of the record date (March 15, 2021) are entitled to virtually attend the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxyholder or representative to virtually attend on the stockholder’s behalf.

Revocation

If you own common stock of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your voting instructions at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy (via the Internet or telephone or by returning a proxy card) bearing a later date or by virtually attending the Annual Meeting and voting. A stockholder owning common stock in street name may revoke or change voting instructions by contacting the bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee holding the shares or by obtaining a legal proxy from such institution and voting virtually at the Annual Meeting.

Our Board currently has eleven seats, divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors.

The Board proposes that Paula Madoff, Thomas Pluta, and Brian West be reelected to Class II for new terms of three years each. Each nominee for director will, if elected, continue in office until the 2024 Annual Meeting and until the director’s successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until the earlier of the director’s death, resignation or removal. The proxy holders named on the proxy card intend to vote the proxy (if you are a stockholder of record) for the election of each of these nominees, unless you indicate on the proxy card that your vote should be cast against any of the nominees. Under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Each nominee has consented to be named as a nominee in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. If any nominee is not able to serve, proxies will be voted in favor of the other nominees and may be voted for a substitute nominee, unless the Board chooses to reduce the number of directors serving on the Board.

The Board recommends a vote “for” each nominee.

Biographical and Related Information of Director Nominees and Continuing Directors

The principal occupations and certain other information about our director nominees and our continuing directors (including the skills and qualifications that led to the conclusion that they should serve as directors) are set forth below. The age shown below for each director is as of May 11, 2021, which is the date of the Annual Meeting.

Nominees for Director Whose Terms Would Expire at the 2024 Annual Meeting

The Board has nominated three directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve for three-year terms ending with the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the earlier of the director’s death, resignation, or removal. Each nominee is currently a director of the Company and has agreed to serve if elected.

 

Paula Madoff

 

		Age: 53		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Key Experience and Qualifications:

In nominating Ms. Madoff for reelection as a director, the Board considered her deep bench of knowledge and experience working with sales and distributions for Goldman’s interest rate products and mortgages, as well as her significant service on boards and board committees.

Ms. Madoff currently serves as an Advisor to Goldman Sachs (“Goldman”). She had been employed by Goldman for 24 years where she was most recently a Partner and Head of Sales and Distribution for Interest Rate Products and Mortgages until her retirement from this position in August 2017. From August 2017 to April 2018, Ms. Madoff was employed as an Advisory Director at Goldman. She brings experience in managing regulatory and market structure changes, investing, risk management, and capital markets activities. Ms. Madoff serves as a non-executive director on the boards of KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.; Great-West Lifeco; and ICE Benchmark Administration, where she is also Chair of the ICE LIBOR Oversight Committee. She held several additional leadership positions at Goldman, including Co-Chair of the Retirement Committee, overseeing 401(k) and pension plan assets; Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives Products, L.P.; and was a member of its Securities Division Operating Committee and Firmwide New Activity Committee. Before joining Goldman, Ms. Madoff worked in Mergers and Acquisitions at Wasserstein Perella & Co. and in Corporate Finance at Bankers Trust. Ms. Madoff is a 2018 David Rockefeller Fellow, a member of the Harvard Business School Alumni Board, a member of the Harvard Kennedy School Women’s Leadership Board, and a Director of Hudson River Park Friends. Ms. Madoff received a B.A. degree in Economics, cum laude, from Lafayette College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

 

Thomas Pluta

 

		Age: 54		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: None

Key Experience and Qualifications:

In nominating Mr. Pluta for reelection as a director, the Board considered his significant trading and management experience and deep knowledge of our industry.

Prior to the series of reorganization transactions that were completed on April 4, 2019 in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, which closed on April 8, 2019 (the “IPO”), whereby Tradeweb Markets LLC (“TWM LLC”) became the principal operating subsidiary of the Company (the “Reorganization Transactions”), Mr. Pluta served on the former board of managers of TWM LLC beginning in December 2017. Mr. Pluta has served as Global Head of the Linear Rates Trading business at J.P. Morgan since July 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Pluta was Co-Head of Global Rates Trading between April 2015 and July 2019 and Global Head of Short Term Interest Rate Trading between January 2014 and April 2015 at J.P. Morgan. In addition to his 24 year career at J.P. Morgan managing trading teams across the Global Rates, Emerging Markets and Foreign Exchange businesses, he serves as the Corporate and Investment Bank lead for the firm-wide LIBOR Transition Program. A champion for advancing the people agenda at J.P. Morgan, Mr. Pluta has been actively engaged throughout his career, and holds leadership positions in various diversity & inclusion, recruiting, and culture-building efforts. He received a B.A. in Economics from Yale University and an M.B.A. in General Management from the Harvard Business School.

Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 2022 Annual Meeting

 

Steven Berns

 

		Age: 56		Director Since: April 2020
		Tradeweb Committees: Audit Committee (Chair)

Key Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Berns was selected to serve on our Board because of his extensive financial knowledge, including from his service as Chief Financial Officer of Tribune, Revlon, TWM LLC and MDC Partners.

Mr. Berns served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GTT Communications, Inc. from April 2020 until January 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Berns served as Chief Financial Officer of Shutterstock, Inc. (“Shutterstock”) from September 2015 to June 2019, and as Chief Operating Officer and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Shutterstock from March 2017 to March 2019 and March 2019 to June 2019, respectively. Prior to joining Shutterstock, Mr. Berns served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tribune Media Company (“Tribune”) from 2013 to 2015, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Revlon, Inc. (“Revlon”) from 2009 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Berns served as the Chief Financial Officer of TWM LLC, the Company’s predecessor, and President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of MDC Partners, Inc. (“MDC Partners”). He previously held several senior financial positions at the Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and Revlon. Mr. Berns currently serves as a board member and Chair of the Audit Committee for Forum Merger III Corporation and Forum Merger IV Corporation and has previously served as a board member of Forum Merger Corporation and LivePerson, Inc. Mr. Berns received a B.S. in Business and Economics from Lehigh University and an Executive MBA in Finance from New York University, Stern School of Business.

 

Martin Brand

 

		Age: 46		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: Compensation Committee (Chair), Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Key Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Brand was selected to serve on our Board because of his significant experience leading private equity investments in financial institutions and extensive board experience.

Mr. Brand is a Senior Managing Director in the Private Equity Group at Blackstone and has held various positions at Blackstone since 2003. Mr. Brand leads the private equity investments in financial institutions, and co-leads private equity investments in technology. In addition, he is a member of the Investment Committee of Blackstone’s Tactical Opportunities funds. Mr. Brand also serves as a director of Kronos, Inc., Exeter Finance Corporation, Paysafe Group Ltd, Refinitiv, First Eagle Investment Management and LSEG. Mr. Brand serves on the Board of the Park Avenue Armory. He is a Trustee of the American Academy, Berlin. Prior to joining Blackstone, he served as a consultant with McKinsey & Company and a derivatives trader with Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. Brand received a B.A./M.A. in Mathematics and Computation from Oxford University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.

Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 2023 Annual Meeting

 

John Finley

 

		Age: 64		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair)

Key Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Finley was selected to serve on our Board because of his extensive business, management and legal experience.

Mr. Finley is a Senior Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer of Blackstone and serves on its Management Committee. Before joining Blackstone, Mr. Finley had been a partner with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett for 22 years where he was a member of that law firm’s Executive Committee and Co-Head of Global M&A. Mr. Finley is an Adviser on the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Corporate Governance Project and a member of the Dean’s Advisory Board of Harvard Law School, the Advisory Board of the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, the Board of Advisors of the Penn Institute for Law and Economics and the Advisory Board of the Penn Netter Center for Community Partnerships. Mr. Finley is also currently a member of the U.S. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. He has served on the Board of Advisors of the Knight-Bagehot Fellowship in Economics and Business Journalism at Columbia University, the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights and the Jewish Board of Family and Children Services. He has also served as Chairman of the Annual International Mergers & Acquisitions Conference of the International Bar Association and on the Committee of Securities Regulation of the New York State Bar Association. Mr. Finley has a BS in Economics, summa cum laude, from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (1978), a B.A. in History, summa cum laude, from the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Pennsylvania (1978) and a JD, cum laude, from Harvard Law School (1981).

 

Scott Ganeles

 

		Age: 57		Director Since: March 2019
		Tradeweb Committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee

Key Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Ganeles was selected to serve on our Board because of his extensive business and management experience and thorough knowledge of our industry.

Mr. Ganeles is currently a Senior Partner at WestCap Group, LLC, a growth equity firm that invests in growth-stage technology businesses in the financial technology, real estate technology and healthcare technology industries as well as asset-light marketplace platforms. Prior to that, Mr. Ganales was the Chief Executive Officer of i-Deal from December 2000 until it merged with Hemscott in 2006 to form Ipreo Holdings LLC. Mr. Ganeles became Chief Executive Officer of Ipreo after the merger and continued as Chief Executive Officer until August 2018. Prior to Ipreo Holdings LLC, Mr. Ganeles was President and Co-Founder of the Carson Group from June 1990 to September 2000. Mr. Ganeles received a B.A. in Political Science from Brown University.

Controlled Company Exception and Director Independence

Our Board has affirmatively determined that Mr. Berns, Mr. Ganeles, Mr. Hughes and Ms. Madoff are independent directors under the rules of Nasdaq, and are independent directors as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.

The Refinitiv Direct Owner and an indirect subsidiary of Refinitiv that, prior to the Reorganization Transactions, owned membership interests of TWM LLC and that continues to own common membership interests of TWM LLC (“LLC Interests”) after the completion of the IPO and Reorganization Transactions (the “Refinitiv LLC Owner”, and together with the Refinitiv Direct Owner, the “Refinitiv Owners”), who are parties to that certain stockholders agreement with the Company (the “Stockholders Agreement”), hold Class B common stock and Class D common stock collectively representing a majority of the combined voting power of our total outstanding common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of Nasdaq. Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

We rely on all of the exemptions listed above. As a result, we do not have a majority of independent directors and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee do not consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the applicable stock exchange rules.

Board Leadership

The Board directs and oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Company in a manner consistent with the best interests of the Company. The Board’s responsibility is one of oversight, and in performing its oversight role, the Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared with our stockholders.

The Board selects its chairperson (“Chairperson”) and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in the manner it considers in the best interests of the Company. Therefore, the Board does not have a policy on whether the roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or combined and, if it is to be separate, whether the Chairperson should be selected from the independent directors. At the present time, Mr. Brand serves as the Chairperson of the Board.

Executive Sessions.

The non-management directors meet in executive session with no members of management present at every regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, and, if the non-management directors include directors who have not been determined to be independent, the independent directors shall separately meet in a private session at least once a year that excludes management and directors who have not been determined to be independent. The Chairperson of the Board (or, if the Chairperson is a management director or is not an independent director, a director designated by the non-management or independent directors, as applicable) presides at the executive sessions of the Board.

Communications with Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing to the General Counsel, Tradeweb Markets Inc., 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. Written communications may be addressed to the Chairperson of the Board, the chairperson of any of the Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees, or to the non-management or independent directors as a group. The General Counsel will forward such communications to the appropriate party.

Board Diversity Policy

The Company recognizes and embraces the benefits of having a diverse Board to enhance the quality of its performance. With a view to achieving a sustainable and balanced development, the Company sees diversity at the Board level as an essential element in supporting the attainment of its strategic objectives and its sustainable development. In designing the Board’s composition, Board diversity is considered from a number of aspects, including but not limited to gender, age, race, ethnicity, nationality, cultural and educational background, professional experience, skills, knowledge and length of service. The ultimate decision on all Board nominations will be based on merit and contribution that the selected candidates will bring to the Board, having due regard for the benefits of diversity on the Board.

Risk Oversight

The Board exercises direct oversight of strategic risks to the Company. The Audit Committee reviews guidelines and policies governing the process by which senior management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk, including the Company’s major financial and operational risk exposures and the steps management takes to monitor and control such exposures. The Company’s Chief Risk Officer updates the Board and the Audit Committee regularly throughout the year, and more frequently as necessary and appropriate. The Board and Audit Committee provide feedback and recommendations accordingly. The Compensation Committee oversees risks relating to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board by overseeing and evaluating programs and risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure and corporate governance. Each committee charged with risk oversight reports to the Board on those matters.

Corporate Governance Documents

Please visit our investor relations website at https://investors.tradeweb.com/corporate-governance/, “Documents and Charters,” for additional information on our corporate governance, including:

Board Meetings and Committees

The Board meets regularly during the year, and holds special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent whenever circumstances require. During 2020, there were six meetings of the Board. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and the total number of meetings held by all committees on which he or she served (during the periods that he or she served) during 2020. In addition, directors are expected to make every effort to virtually attend any meetings of stockholders.

The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (collectively, the “Committees”). The Committees keep the Board informed of their actions and provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to stockholders. The Committees meet regularly during the year, and hold special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent whenever circumstances require. The table below provides current membership information as well as meeting information for the last fiscal year.

The functions performed by these Committees, which are set forth in more detail in their charters, are summarized below.

Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Berns, as Chairperson, Mr. Ganeles, and Ms. Madoff. The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Mr. Berns qualifies as our “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of regulations adopted by the SEC. Our Board has also determined that each of Mr. Berns, Mr. Ganeles and Ms. Madoff are “independent” as defined under Nasdaq rules and the Exchange Act and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The Audit Committee recommends the annual appointment and reviews the independence of auditors and reviews the scope of audit and non-audit assignments and related fees, the results of the annual audit, accounting principles used in financial reporting, internal auditing procedures, the adequacy of our internal control procedures, related party transactions and investigations into matters related to audit functions. The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing risk management on behalf of our Board.

Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Brand, as Chairperson, Mr. Finley, Mr. Ganeles, Ms. Madoff and Mr. West. The principal responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to review and approve matters involving executive and director compensation, recommend changes in employee benefit programs, authorize equity and other incentive arrangements and authorize our Company to enter into employment and other employee-related agreements. The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Finley, as Chairperson, Mr. Brand, and Ms. Madoff. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, makes recommendations for nominees for committees and develops, recommends to the Board and reviews our corporate governance principles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Director Nominations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies individuals believed to be qualified as candidates to serve on the Board and selects, or recommends that the Board select, the nominees for all directorships to be filled by the Board or by our stockholders at an annual or special meeting. In identifying candidates for membership on the Board, the Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include (a) individual qualifications, including strength of character, mature judgment, familiarity with the Company’s business and industry, independence of thought and an ability to work collegially and (b) all other factors the Committee considers appropriate, which may include age, gender and ethnic diversity, diversity of background, existing commitments to other businesses, potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits, legal considerations such as antitrust issues, corporate governance background, various and relevant career experience, relevant technical skills, relevant business or government acumen, financial and accounting background, executive compensation background and the size, composition and combined expertise of the existing Board. The Committee also may consider the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board. When evaluating whether to re-nominate existing directors, the Committee considers matters relating to the retirement of current directors, including term limits or age limits, as well as the performance of such directors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director candidates recommended by stockholders on a substantially similar basis as it considers other nominees. Any recommendation submitted to the Secretary should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and the written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Secretary, Tradeweb Markets Inc., 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. All recommendations for nomination received by the Secretary that satisfy the requirements of our Bylaws relating to such director nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Please see the section entitled “Proposals of Stockholders” for information regarding the advance notice provisions applicable to stockholder director nominations set forth in our Bylaws.

In addition, pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, the Refinitiv Owners have the right to designate nominees to our Board subject to the maintenance of certain ownership requirements in us. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Related Party Transactions Entered Into in Connection With the IPO — Stockholders Agreement” for additional information.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our executive officers serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. No interlocking relationship exists between any member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee performing equivalent

functions) and any executive, member of the Board or member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee performing equivalent functions) of any other company.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and all global employees. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at https://investors.tradeweb.com/corporate-governance/. See “Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance Documents” for additional information. In the event that we amend or waive certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer that requires disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we intend to disclose the same on our website. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was most recently amended on November 18, 2020. The information contained on, or accessible from, our website is not part of this Proxy Statement by reference or otherwise.

Under the rules and regulations of the SEC, Nasdaq and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee considers the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm and participates in the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm’s lead engagement partner. The Audit Committee has appointed, and, as a matter of good corporate governance, is requesting ratification by our stockholders of the appointment of, the registered public accounting firm of Deloitte to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Deloitte has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since November 2018.

The Board and the Audit Committee believe that the continued retention of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte, the Audit Committee will evaluate the stockholder vote when considering the selection of a registered public accounting firm for the audit engagement for the 2021 fiscal year. In addition, even if stockholders ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee may nevertheless periodically request proposals from the major registered public accounting firms and as a result of such process may select Deloitte or another registered public accounting firm as our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board recommends a vote “for” ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

As a result of the transaction pursuant to which Refinitiv indirectly acquired on October 1, 2018 substantially all of the financial and risk business of the Thomson Reuters and Thomson Reuters indirectly acquired a 45% ownership interest in Refinitiv (the “Refinitiv Transaction”), PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, TWM LLC’s independent registered public accounting firm, ceased to be independent with respect to TWM LLC on October 1, 2018. Accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was dismissed as TWM LLC’s independent registered public accounting firm for financial statement periods beginning subsequent to September 30, 2018. The dismissal of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP became effective upon issuance by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP of its report on the consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, and the subsequent interim period through September 30, 2018, (i) there were no “disagreements” between us and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their reports on the financial statements for such periods, and (ii) there were no “reportable events” as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

TWM LLC has provided a copy of the above statements to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and requested that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP furnish TWM LLC with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not they agree with the above disclosure. A copy of that letter, dated October 15, 2019, is filed as an exhibit to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on October 15, 2019.

On November 11, 2018, the Company engaged Deloitte as its independent registered public accounting firm, and TWM LLC also engaged Deloitte as its independent registered public accounting firm on February 6, 2019. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and the subsequent interim period through September 30, 2018, TWM LLC (or any person on its behalf) did not consult with Deloitte regarding any of the matters described in Items 304(a)(2)(i) or 304(a)(2)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Representatives of Deloitte are expected to virtually attend the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Consistent with SEC and PCAOB requirements regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of, the independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Prior to engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next year’s audit, management will submit to the Audit Committee for approval a list of services and related fees expected to be rendered during that year within each of the following four categories of services:

Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves independent registered public accounting firm services within each category and the fees of each category are budgeted. The Audit Committee requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval categories. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All of the services in the table below were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The following is a description of the professional services performed and the fees billed by Deloitte for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are seeking an advisory vote from our stockholders to approve the compensation of our named executive officers for the 2020 fiscal year, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our overall compensation policies and procedures relating to the named executive officers.

As described in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program and the compensation awarded to our executive officers; adopts changes to the program; and approves compensation as appropriate to reflect the Company’s circumstances and to promote the main objectives of the program. These objectives include, but are not limited to:

We are asking you to indicate your support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. We believe the information we have provided in this Proxy Statement demonstrates that our compensation program is designed appropriately and works to ensure that the interests of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are aligned with your interest in long-term value creation.

Accordingly, our Board recommends that the Company’s stockholders vote “FOR” the following resolution to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative disclosure, is hereby approved on an advisory basis.

Although this vote is advisory, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee intend to consider the results of the vote, as well as other relevant factors, as we continue to evolve our executive compensation program.

The Board recommends a vote “for” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are seeking our stockholders’ views on how frequently we should hold future advisory “say on pay” votes with regard to the compensation of our named executive officers, as demonstrated by Item 3 of this Proxy Statement. Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides that stockholders must be given the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding and advisory basis, to express their preference as to whether a “say on pay” advisory vote should occur every year, every two years or every three years. This Item 4 asks stockholders to submit their “say on pay” frequency preference (having a choice of: every one year, every two years or every three years), or stockholders may abstain from voting on the proposal.

After careful consideration, it is the opinion of the Board that an advisory “say on pay” vote every three years is the most appropriate option for us. We believe that a triennial voting frequency will provide our stockholders with sufficient time to evaluate the effectiveness of our overall compensation philosophy, policies and practices in connection with our long-term business results for the corresponding period, while avoiding over-emphasis on short-term variations in compensation and business results. In addition, given our stage of development and structure, we believe that a vote occurring once every three years will permit the Company to have the appropriate time to consider feedback received from our stockholders, review whether any changes to our executive compensation policies and programs should be implemented, and evaluate the results of those changes, if any, before a new advisory vote is held.

Accordingly, the Board has determined that an advisory “say on pay” vote shall be held every three years, subject to approval by stockholders of such frequency. As an advisory vote, the result of the vote is not binding. However, the Board values the opinions of our stockholders in their vote on this matter, and therefore, if the frequency approved by our stockholders is not every three years, the Board will again consider the appropriate frequency of the advisory “say on pay” vote, taking into account the outcome of the advisory stockholder vote.

The Board recommends a vote “three year” for the frequency with which stockholders of the Company shall be entitled to have an advisory vote on executive compensation.

The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, for preparing the financial statements, and for the reporting process. The Audit Committee members do not serve as professional accountants or auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and our independent registered public accounting firm. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to audit and report on the conformity of the Company’s financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

In this context, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Audited Financial Statements”), management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and SEC, including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding our independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

Based upon the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Audited Financial Statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee

Steven Berns, Chairperson

Scott Ganeles

Paula Madoff

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock as of March 15, 2021 for:

The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under rules issued by the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power. Applicable percentage ownership is based on 104,148,335 shares of Class A common stock, 96,933,192 shares of Class B common stock, 1,654,825 shares of Class C common stock and 28,877,108 shares of Class D common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2021. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by an individual or entity and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options, or other rights, including the redemption rights described elsewhere in this proxy statement, held by such person that have vested or will vest within 60 days of March 15, 2021 are considered outstanding, although these shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all listed stockholders is c/o Tradeweb Markets Inc., 1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036. Each of the stockholders listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder unless noted otherwise, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers, including age as of May 11, 2021, other than for Mr. Olesky and Mr. Hult, whose biographical information is presented under “Item 1 — Election of Directors.”

Enrico Bruni, 49, has served as Managing Director, Head of Europe and Asia Business of TWM LLC since February 2013 and has served in the same position at Tradeweb since April 2019. Mr. Bruni joined Tradeweb in 2002 and has been instrumental in developing the interest rate swaps business in Europe and Asia. Prior to joining Tradeweb, from 1995 to 2002, Mr. Bruni was at J.P. Morgan where he worked in a number of business and product management roles across the markets division, with particular focus on their e-trading strategy. Mr. Bruni received a business management degree from L. Bocconi University, Milan.

Douglas Friedman, 50, has served as Tradeweb’s General Counsel and Secretary since its formation and as the General Counsel of TWM LLC since November 2009, prior to which he served as the Assistant General Counsel of TWM LLC beginning in June 2005. Mr. Friedman is actively involved in regulatory discussions impacting global financial markets and is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Treasury Market Practices Group and has participated in Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CTFC) and industry discussions on the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as well as SEC panels on securities and derivatives reform. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Mr. Friedman worked in the litigation department of King & Spalding LLP, an international law firm, from 2001 to 2005, where he focused on securities litigation and regulatory investigations. Prior to that, he worked at Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft LLP and at Gibbons P.C. He received a B.A. from the University of Michigan and a J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law.

Simon Maisey, 49, has served as Managing Director, Global Head of Corporate Development of TWM LLC since May 2016 and has served in the same position at Tradeweb since April 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Maisey served as Managing Director in Finance and Business Development of TWM LLC beginning in May 2014. Prior to joining Tradeweb, from 1998 to May 2014, Mr. Maisey worked at J.P. Morgan, most recently in the position of Managing Director, eCommerce for the global rates business. In addition, he has also held roles as COO and CFO of J.P. Morgan’s fixed income businesses and served on the TWM LLC board of directors as a J.P. Morgan representative from 2009 to 2014. He holds a MEng (Hons) from the University of Oxford.

Justin Peterson, 58, has served as Chief Technology Officer of Tradeweb since April 1, 2020, and has served on TWM LLC’s Global Operating Committee since January 2014. Mr. Peterson joined TWM LLC in 1999 and served as Managing Director, Head of Institutional Technology, from January 2008 to March 2020. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Mr. Peterson served as Vice President at Citibank from 1995 to 1999. Prior to that, he held positions at NYNEX Science and Technology and Hughes Aircraft Company. Mr. Peterson holds a B.S. in engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and a Ph.D. and M.S. in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Robert Warshaw, 67, has served as Tradeweb’s Chief Financial Officer since its formation and as the Chief Financial Officer of TWM LLC since May 2011. Mr. Warshaw joined the Company in July 2009 as a managing director and Head of Equities and became Head of Business Development in November 2010. Prior to joining Tradeweb, Mr. Warshaw led venture capital-backed technology startups in the electronic trading, telepresence and social networking fields. Prior to that, he served as Chief Information Officer and a director of Lazard as well as a partner at McKinsey & Company, where he advised large companies in the financial and technology sectors. Mr. Warshaw began his career at the former Andersen Consulting, since renamed Accenture, where he worked on a series of global assignments in the financial sector. He received a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania and a master of management from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Scott Zucker, 52, has served as Tradeweb’s Chief Risk and Administrative Officer since February 2020 and served as Chief Administrative Officer since its formation and as the Chief Administrative Officer of TWM LLC since November 2009. He joined the company in 2002 as General Counsel. Prior to joining Tradeweb, from 1999 to 2002, Mr. Zucker worked in the Corporate Department of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, an international law firm, providing legal, regulatory and securities law support exclusively to Bloomberg LP. He also worked in the Corporate Department of Robinson, Silverman, Pearce, Aronsohn and Berman LLP (now Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP) from 1996 to 1999, where he specialized in general corporate and securities matters. Mr. Zucker is a member of the Market Risk Advisory Committee of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and serves on the board of directors of Habitat for Humanity NYC. He received a B.A. from Tufts University and a J.D. from Hofstra University School of Law

Compensation Discussion & Analysis Purpose

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) presents in detail our executive compensation philosophy and practices, describing each element of compensation and the decision-making process by our Compensation Committee that supports it. We encourage you to read this CD&A in conjunction with the compensation tables that follow for additional context to the Compensation Committee’s decisions with respect to the 2020 compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), as listed below.

Company Overview

Summary of 2020 Performance

Tradeweb is a leader in building and operating electronic marketplaces for its network of clients located in 65+ countries globally. We have a powerful client network that had a daily trading average in 2020 of over $0.8 trillion across our global electronic marketplaces, which are deeply integrated in, and supported by, our proprietary technology. Since our inception, we have combined the creativity of our employees, power of our technology, and depth of our network to collaboratively innovate with our clients to simplify their workflows across the fixed income and equity markets.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic became a global emergency, requiring businesses to reassess their operations and take steps to ensure the safety of their employees and survival of their business. Despite the widespread economic uncertainty caused by COVID-19, Tradeweb, as a virtual marketplace company, was able to quickly and efficiently invoke its business continuity procedures to enable employees to work from home and customers to connect from their business continuity infrastructure to our marketplaces. As such, we have successfully avoided any layoffs, furloughs or salary reductions among our workforce due to COVID-19, while being able to maintain our business operations and keep our employees safe.

The shockwaves created by the COVID-19 pandemic further illuminated the importance of Tradeweb as a critical marketplace. We helped our clients seamlessly shift their workflows remotely and trade more than a trillion dollars in volume on a number of days, a feat that would have been unthinkable only a few years ago. We believe the acceleration of digitization that we saw in 2020 is here to stay and we remain excited about the opportunity ahead of us to drive further innovation across our markets. We believe the defining trends underpinning our growth, such as technological advances, globalization of debt, growth of ETFs, focus on cost reduction, and data-driven trading, have a long runway. We remain focused on responding to these trends as we strive to be the primary electronic price discovery and trading platform where our clients can efficiently discover the best price across rates, credit, OTC equities and money markets.

Despite the unprecedented challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, our 2020 results demonstrate that our investments in our network, technology, and people continue to bring value to the Company’s stockholders. Highlights of our 2020 financial performance and other matters include:

*Adjusted EBITDA margin is a non-GAAP financial measure used by the Company to supplement information on our financial results. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure may be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021, under the heading “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 7.

Compensation Program Highlights for 2020

The following are some of the highlights of our fiscal 2020 executive compensation program:

“Say-on-Pay” Vote

Prior to 2020, Tradeweb was considered an “emerging growth company” and therefore not required to undertake a say-on-pay vote for executive compensation. This will be the first year Tradeweb conducts say-on-pay and say-on-frequency votes and the Company intends to take the results of these votes into consideration in its executive compensation decisions and shareholder engagement activities going forward.

Determining Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation Practices

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain the leadership needed for the success of our business. We believe that investing in our talent through a market-based and flexible total compensation program has been critical to the success of Tradeweb, enabling us to promote both short- and long-term profitable growth of the Company and achieve our ultimate goal of bringing value to our customers and stockholders. Our compensation philosophy emphasizes creating an “ownership mentality” to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders. To this end, our total compensation program is guided by the following principles:

Compensation Determination Process

Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee of our Board is responsible for establishing and overseeing the executive compensation arrangements for our executive officers, including our NEOs, as described above in the section titled “Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee.” The formal written Compensation Committee charter is available on our website.

The Compensation Committee meets annually, along with, at the request of the Compensation Committee, the Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel. As part of the annual review process, the Compensation Committee will specifically:

The Compensation Committee makes the above determinations in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, and has delegated certain other responsibilities to the Chief Executive Officer, as described further below.

Role of our CEO. Our Chief Executive Officer informs our Compensation Committee on the individual performance and contributions of each of the NEOs and consults with the Compensation Committee for all compensation decisions concerning the NEOs (including himself and the President). Following such consultation, the Compensation Committee makes compensation determinations (including base salary, bonus, and equity grants) for the Chief Executive Officer and President, as outlined above. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer will review, with the Compensation Committee, base salary, bonus, and equity award opportunities for all other NEOs. Ultimately, the Compensation Committee retains full authority over the final compensation decisions for all NEOs; however, the Compensation Committee will generally rely on the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer for all decisions concerning NEOs other than the Chief Executive Officer, and provides the Chief Executive Officer with discretion to make reasonable adjustments that he deems prudent (other than with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and President).

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program consists of a mix of fixed and variable pay elements, with the latter tied to both short- and long-term company success. Performance-based pay elements are linked to goals that we believe will deliver both year-over-year and long-term increases in stockholder value. The elements of total direct executive compensation for our NEOs include:

The Compensation Committee does not maintain any formal policy or formula for allocating the mix of compensation as it believes it is more important to remain flexible to respond to business needs and shifts in the marketplace in which the Company must compete to recruit and retain executive talent, and also to take into consideration individual performance and responsibilities of the NEOs each year. Therefore, the Compensation Committee retains the authority to review our NEOs’ compensation periodically and to use its discretion to adjust the mix of compensation and the amount of any element of compensation as it deems appropriate for each NEO.

The charts below illustrate the allocation of the principal compensation components discussed above for our NEOs for fiscal 2020.

The amounts included in the above charts are based on (1) grant-date fair values for long-term incentive equity awards, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table below, (2) target bonus compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and President, and (3) actual bonuses earned in 2020 for all other NEOs.

FISCAL 2020 COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL

Base Salaries

We believe that base salary plays an important role in attracting and retaining top executive talent. We set base salaries that reflect each individual’s duties, responsibilities, experience and performance. Base salaries are reviewed annually by (A) the Compensation Committee for the Chief Executive Officer and President and (B) the Chief Executive Officer for all other NEOs; however we generally do not provide for merit salary increases for the NEOs other than in connection with an executive’s promotion. As such, the Compensation Committee determined to keep base salaries for the NEOs in fiscal 2020 consistent with the base salaries provided for fiscal 2019, as set forth on the table below.

Annual Cash Bonuses

CEO and President

Messrs. Olesky and Hult are each party to an employment agreement with TWM LLC (described further below in the section entitled “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Employment Agreements with our Named Executive Officers”) pursuant to which the executive is entitled to an annual cash bonus based on Company performance. For calendar year 2020, Messrs. Olesky and Hult each had a target bonus opportunity of $3.75 million and $3.35 million, respectively. Achievement of the annual bonus is based on TWM LLC’s attainment of certain performance goals set annually by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee sets the target performance goals each year based on the budget approved by the Board the preceding quarter, reflecting a rigorous goal for the Company set to motivate the executives and drive performance. The maximum performance goals were set at a level that represented significant outperformance verses target, while thresholds were set at a level that still represented meaningful year-over-year growth. The actual amount paid to the executive can be greater or less than the target bonus depending on the extent to which these goals are achieved (or exceeded) using straight-line interpolation between target and achievement above or below, as applicable, target amounts. The payout can range from 0% to 200% of target. For 2020, achievement of the annual bonus was based 50% on attainment of annual revenue growth targets and 50% on attainment of minimum EBITDA margin thresholds. The table below sets forth the relevant revenue growth and EBITDA margin pay-for-performance scales for calendar year 2020.

Based on the 2020 performance, as confirmed by the Compensation Committee, the Company achieved revenue growth of 14.5% and EBITDA margin of 48.5%, resulting in 200% achievement with respect to both the revenue and EBITDA portions of the annual bonus targets. As such, Messrs. Olesky and Hult were each entitled to a bonus at 200% of their respective target bonus amounts, as summarized in the table below.

NEOs other than the CEO and President

Each year the Compensation Committee approves the methodology for determining the cash bonus pool for the upcoming year for annual bonus grants to employees, including the NEOs. The bonus pool is increased or decreased based on achievement of specified Company performance goals. For 2020, Company performance was based on revenue growth versus prior year achievement. For achievement above budget (set at 11.2% revenue growth for 2020), the bonus pool increases $0.25 per $1.00 of revenue growth. For achievement below budget, the bonus pool decreases $0.13 per $1.00 of revenue missed. For revenue growth above or below budget, a straight-line interpolation between target and achievement above or below, as applicable, target amounts is used to calculate the bonus amount based on full year revenue growth. The bonus pool does not have a “cap” or “floor” for achievement above or below target. Based on the 2020 performance, the Company exceeded its budget with revenue growth of 14.5%.

Each of the NEOs other than Messrs. Olesky and Hult is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus from the bonus pool as recommended by Mr. Olesky, subject to final approval by the Compensation Committee. The allocations of the awards from the bonus pool are based on individual considerations, including individual performance as well as Company performance as a whole. The Company does not allocate bonuses based on set metrics in order to provide for a flexible bonus program designed to reward individual accomplishments. Individual considerations may include, but are not limited to, the executive’s ability to manage expenses, operate his business segment within its forecasted budget and, as applicable, achieve forecasted revenue projections. Despite the challenges arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s overall performance in fiscal 2020 was stronger than anticipated. As noted above, the Company achieved excellent financial performance outcomes, which we believe are strongly linked to the skills and dedication of our executive leadership team, including the NEOs. This resulted in a bonus pool above the target pool. In addition to the Company’s strong financial performance, individual considerations when allocating bonuses for 2020 included, but were not limited to, (i) the ability of the executive team to adapt to the Company’s new status as a public company, (ii) for Mr. Peterson, his increased responsibilities as a result of his promotion to Chief Technology Officer, (iii) for Mr. Bruni, his management of the Company’s international business, which has become an increasingly significant portion of the Company’s overall revenue, and (iv) for Mr. Warshaw, his oversight and effective management of the finance function.

In light of their individual performance, the Compensation Committee approved the following bonuses for each NEO (other than Messrs. Olesky and Hult, discussed above) with respect to performance for calendar year 2020.

We believe that the above annual cash bonus programs are important incentive tools for motivating achievement of the Company’s goals for the forthcoming fiscal year. We do not provide for guaranteed bonus payouts.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

The main objectives of our long-term equity incentive program are to: (1) incentivize our executives to work toward the achievement of both our short- and long-term performance goals, (2) provide competitive compensation opportunities in order to attract and retain key individuals, (3) promote retention of executives through multi-year vesting periods, and (4) create strong alignment with stockholders’ interests by fostering an “ownership mentality” among our executives. We believe these objectives are accomplished through the equity compensation program described below.

Each year the Compensation Committee establishes an aggregate pool for equity awards to be granted to employees for that year. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, then allocates awards under that pool to the Chief Executive Officer and President based on the executive’s performance for the prior year. For all other NEOs, allocations are made based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer based on the executive’s performance for the prior year, but are subject to Compensation Committee approval in all cases. For 2020, these awards included performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the Tradeweb Markets Inc. 2019 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), the material terms of which are described below.

With respect to the PRSUs, each year the Compensation Committee establishes performance goals for the applicable plan year and the number of PRSUs earned is based on the extent to which the performance goals are achieved (the “Performance Modifier”). The Performance Modifier is based on Company performance for that initial year of grant. Once the Performance Modifier is set and the award is earned, there is a two year additional vesting period, with the final vesting date being on January 1 following the third calendar year in which the award is first outstanding. The Performance Modifier is applied to all vested PRSUs at the time of settlement, which occurs on the first trading day following vesting of the award.

The Performance Modifier for PRSU grants made in calendar year 2020 was based 50% on revenue growth and 50% on EBITDA margin. The table below displays the relevant EBITDA margin and revenue growth goals for calendar year 2020, and potential achievement of a Performance Modifier ranging from 0% to 200%. We believe that EBITDA margin and revenue growth are the most precise and reliable indicators of Company performance, and therefore consider them the most relevant for purposes of establishing performance goals for executive compensation. Our intention is to establish rigorous performance goals for the Company set to motivate the executives and drive performance above budget. The maximum performance goals for PRSUs were set at a level that represented significant outperformance versus budget, while thresholds were set at a level that still represented meaningful year-over-year growth. These performance goals are set based on a one-year period to ensure executives are motivated on a year-to-year basis. The Compensation Committee has determined that it would be difficult to set effective goals more than one year out due to the nature of the Company’s growth and expansion of the business into other markets (including internationally). Setting performance goals each year provides the Company flexibility to alter thresholds each year based on outperformance of budget, to reflect changing needs and growth of the Company, and to ensure executives remain engaged and motivated. While financial performance is measured on a one-year period, awards still continue to vest for a two-year period after financial performance is determined and remain tied to our stock performance over that time period, ensuring that executives’ interests are still aligned with those of our stockholders over the long-term.

Based on the 2020 performance, as confirmed by the Compensation Committee, the Company achieved revenue growth of 14.5% and EBITDA margin of 48.5%, resulting in the maximum Performance Modifier of 200% for the 2020 PRSUs.

PRSUs granted to the NEOs are settled exclusively in shares, less any withholding and employment taxes associated with the settlement of the PRSUs. In addition, the PRSUs accumulate dividend equivalent rights in respect of any dividends paid on shares (on a one share to one PRSU basis) from January 1 of the applicable calendar year in which the relevant award was granted through the relevant vesting date. To the extent the PRSUs that gave rise to any dividend equivalent right are forfeited upon a termination, those dividend equivalent rights will be forfeited. Dividend equivalent rights accumulated and not forfeited are added to, and are paid at the same time and in the same form as, payments in respect of the related PRSUs as set forth above.

The RSUs vest annually over three years (1/3 per year) from the date of grant based on the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. The RSUs also settle in shares on the first trading date following the date of vesting and accumulate dividend equivalent rights from the date of grant.

The table below sets forth the PRSUs and RSUs granted to the NEOs in 2020. Executives were awarded a grant value by the Compensation Committee, as described above, which was split evenly between PRSUs and RSUs based on the closing price on the date prior to the date of grant. The PRSUs listed below are based on a 100% Performance Modifier, which was the targeted achievement at the time of grant.

In addition, all of the PRSUs and RSUs awarded to our NEOs provide for accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of certain events, such as certain terminations of employment or a change in control, as described below in the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” For a description of PRSUs and RSUs that are currently outstanding under the Equity Plan, see the table titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

We believe that the mix of PRSUs and RSUs granted to our NEOs directly correlates to our compensation objectives and philosophy. The PRSUs encourage strong alignment with stockholders’ interest in growth given that they are directly tied to EBITDA margin and revenue growth, and both the PRSUs and RSUs

support retention and stock price alignment by allowing award recipients the opportunity to receive Company stock if they are still employed by us on the date the award vests.

Legacy Equity Plans — Options and PRSUs

Each NEO continues to hold outstanding awards under our pre-IPO plans (which were amended and restated at the time of our IPO), including the Amended and Restated Tradeweb Markets Inc. 2018 Share Option Plan (previously the TWM LLC 2018 Share Option Plan) (the “Option Plan”) and the Amended & Restated Tradeweb Markets Inc. PRSU Plan (previously the TWM LLC PRSU Plan) (the “PRSU Plan”).

Each NEO was granted options to purchase shares (the “Options”) under the Option Plan on October 26, 2018. Each Option was granted with the following vesting provisions: (i) 50% of the Option vests ratably over a four-year vesting period based on continued employment (the “Time-Based Portion”), and (ii) 50% of the Option vests based on satisfying certain performance conditions (the “Performance-Based Portion”), as further described below. The Time-Based Portion is currently fully vested for each NEO as a result of accelerated vesting upon the Company’s IPO. For the Performance-Based Portion, (i) 50% is eligible to vest in four equal annual installments based on achievement of Company EBITDA growth targets for 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, and (ii) 50% is eligible to vest in four equal annual installments based on the Company’s achievement of certain revenue growth targets for each of 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 (the “Revenue-Based Portion”). If at least 80% of the applicable revenue growth target is achieved for a given year, the Revenue-Based Portion will vest as to 0%, based on 80% achievement of target, and 100%, based on full achievement of target. For performance achievement between 80% and 100% of target, the Revenue-Based Portion will vest based on straight-line interpolation from 0% to 100%. To the extent the relevant EBITDA targets and revenue targets are not achieved for any calendar year, the portion of the Performance-Based Portion eligible to become vested for such year shall become vested the first time the relevant EBITDA and revenue targets are fully achieved in a later year, if at all.

Vesting of the Performance-Based Portion in respect of calendar year 2020 was based on achievement of a: (A) gross revenue target of $785.916 million (representing 7.5% growth over the 2019 gross revenue target of $731.085) and (B) EBITDA target of $294.404 million (representing 8.8% growth over the 2019 EBITDA target of $270.592). The Company exceeded each of its performance goals for 2020 with an actual gross revenue of $892.659 million and $386.098 million EBITDA achievement. The Performance-Based Portion has therefore vested with respect to 75% in respect of performance for fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 (i.e., the full amount eligible to become vested in those years), resulting in 12.5% of the Option (or, 25% of the Performance-based Portion) remaining outstanding and eligible to vest based on Company performance for 2021.

Each NEO was granted PRSUs in 2019 under the PRSU Plan which remain outstanding. The PRSUs granted under the PRSU Plan are subject to terms similar to those granted under the Equity Plan, described above. Outstanding PRSUs granted under the PRSU Plan will vest on January 1, 2022.

For more information on the outstanding Options and PRSUs granted under the Option Plan and PRSU Plan, please see the table titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”

Retirement Plans

The Company maintains a tax-qualified defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that provides retirement benefits to employees, including matching contributions. Each of Messrs. Olesky, Warshaw, Hult and Peterson are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same terms as other participating employees. Mr. Bruni is eligible to participate in the Company’s contributory pension scheme for employees located in Europe on the same terms as other participating employees.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

The Company provides the NEOs with perquisites and other personal benefits, or an allowance for certain perquisites, that it believes are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program to better enable the Company to attract and retain key individuals. Such perquisites and benefits include (i) financial

planning services, (ii) executive life insurance, (iii) group life insurance, (v) executive long-term disability insurance, (vi) excess liability insurance, and (vii) reimbursement for annual club membership dues.

Clawbacks

The Company maintains a clawback policy which applies to all executive officers (including the NEOs), certain senior managers, and other designated employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose of the policy is to create and maintain a culture that emphasizes integrity and accountability and that reinforces the Company’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. The policy provides that, in the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement of financial statements, the Company will make a reasonable attempt to recover the portion of the incentive compensation that was paid to the officer or other employee during the three most recently completed fiscal years based on the erroneous data. Separately, if it is determined that an officer or other employee covered by the policy has intentionally engaged in misconduct, fraud or other illegal conduct, which contributed to the circumstances requiring an accounting restatement, and the Compensation Committee determines it would be appropriate to seek recovery under the policy, the Company will make a reasonable attempt to recover part or all of the incentive compensation (as described in the policy) that was paid to the officer or other employee during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

Securities Trading Policy

To ensure alignment of the interests of our stockholders and executive officers, including our NEOs, as well as compliance with applicable securities laws, the Company’s Securities Trading Policy (i) prohibits all employees from engaging in transactions involving the Company’s stock based on material non-public information or communicating material non-public information to any person who uses that information to purchase or sell Company securities, and (ii) requires directors, executive officers (including the NEOs) and certain other designated employees (as identified in the Securities Trading Policy) to preclear any trading in Company securities, whether or not during an open trade window (except that such policies shall not apply to the exercise of options not involving a market sale to generate cash to pay the exercise price, the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards or transactions in accordance with a previously established trading plan that meets SEC requirements). In addition, as part of our Securities Trading Policy, (i) directors, officers, employees and certain other covered persons (as identified in the Securities Trading Policy), whether or not he or she possesses material non-public information, may not trade in options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments on the Company’s securities or engage in short shares, (ii) no directors, officers or employees may engage in any transactions (including variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities, and (iii) no directors, officers or employees, whether or not in possession of material non-public information, may purchase the Company’s securities on margin, or borrow against any account in which the Company’s securities are held, or pledge the Company’s securities as collateral for a loan, without first obtaining pre-clearance.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Compensation Committee considers tax and accounting implications in its executive compensation determinations, although in some cases, other important considerations may outweigh tax or accounting considerations, and the Compensation Committee maintains the flexibility to compensate its officers in accordance with the Company’s compensation philosophy.

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Section 162(m)”), a publicly held corporation generally is limited to a $1 million annual tax deduction for compensation paid to each of its “covered employees.” The Company has historically taken the position that, as a result of its corporate structure, the deduction limitation imposed by Section 162(m) does not apply to its employees who are employed by TWM LLC or its subsidiaries. However, on December 18, 2020, the Treasury Department released final regulations under Section 162(m) (the “Final Regulations”) that generally provided

that when a publicly held corporation (such as the Company) holds a partnership interest (such as our interest in TWM LLC), the corporation must take into account its distributive share of the partnership’s deduction for compensation paid to covered employees of the corporation. These new rules do not apply to compensation that is “grandfathered” under special transition rules for compensation paid in 2020 or that is paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on December 20, 2019, which is not materially modified or renewed or cancelable by the company after that date.

By virtue of the Final Regulations, our equity awards granted through 2019 will qualify as grandfathered awards, but compensation related to equity awards granted in 2020 and related to future equity awards, along with cash starting in 2021, paid to those of our employees considered “covered employees” will be subject to the compensation deduction limitations under Section 162(m). Going forward, while it is only one of many factors, the Compensation Committee will consider the impact of Section 162(m) on its compensation arrangements, and it is anticipated that the Compensation Committee will, in its discretion and when it deems appropriate, enter into compensation arrangements with those employees considered “covered employees” under which payments may not be fully deductible under Section 162(m).

Compensation Committee Report

We, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, reviewed and had the opportunity to discuss with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above and, based upon our review, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this report.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to the NEOs that is attributable to services performed during fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020, as required.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table summarizes the awards granted to each of the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements with our Named Executive Officers

Messrs. Olesky and Hult are each party to an employment agreement with TWM LLC. Mr. Bruni is party to an employment agreement with Tradeweb Europe Ltd (“TW Europe”). The other NEOs are not party to any employment agreement.

Mr. Olesky - Chief Executive Officer

TWM LLC is party to an employment agreement with Mr. Olesky for the position of Chief Executive Officer of TWM LLC. For as long as he is Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Olesky is entitled to be a member of the Board. Mr. Olesky’s employment agreement provides for an initial term that ended on December 31, 2020, subject to automatic one-year extensions unless either TWM LLC or Mr. Olesky provides written notice of intent not to renew at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then-applicable term. He is entitled to a base salary of $770,000 per year, subject to increase at the discretion of the Board and/or the compensation committee of the Board. Mr. Olesky is also eligible to participate in an annual bonus plan, described above in the section entitled “Fiscal 2020 Compensation Program in Detail — Annual Cash Bonuses.” Mr. Olesky is also entitled to participate in TWM LLC’s executive employee benefit plans, including its equity-based plans, and is entitled to six weeks of paid vacation annually.

Mr. Olesky’s employment agreement subjects Mr. Olesky to the following restrictive covenants: (i) non-solicitation of employees of TWM LLC and non-interference with customers and clients of TWM LLC during employment and the Non-Solicitation Period (as defined below); (ii) non-competition during employment and the CEO Non-Competition Period (as defined below); and (iii) perpetual non-disclosure of confidential information. The “CEO Non-Competition Period” means (x) in the event of a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason, eighteen (18) months following termination; and (y) in the event of a termination for any other reason, twelve (12) months following termination; provided, that, in the event Mr. Olesky resigns without Good Reason, Mr. Olesky’s service as a non-executive director or in a similar capacity with respect to a Restricted Enterprise (as defined in his employment agreement) is not deemed to be a violation of the noncompetition restriction, unless the Restricted Enterprise is ICAP, MarketAxess, IHS Markit or Bloomberg, in which case such service is not permitted for six (6) months following termination. The definitions of “Cause” and “Good Reason” as defined in Mr. Olesky’s employment agreement are described below under the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” The “Non-Solicitation Period” means, (x) in the event of a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason, eighteen (18) months following termination; and (y) in the event of a termination for any other reason, twelve (12) months following termination.

Mr. Hult - President

TWM LLC is party to an employment agreement with Mr. Hult for the position of President of TWM LLC. For as long as he is President, Mr. Hult is entitled to be a member of the Board. Mr. Hult’s employment agreement provides for an initial term ending on December 31, 2020, subject to automatic one-year extensions unless either TWM LLC or Mr. Hult provides written notice of intent not to renew at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then-applicable term. He is entitled to a base salary of $660,000 per year, subject to increase at the discretion of the Board and/or the compensation committee of the Board. Mr. Hult is also eligible to participate in an annual bonus plan, as described above in the section titled “Fiscal 2020 Compensation Program in Detail — Annual Cash Bonuses.” Mr. Hult is also entitled to participate in TWM LLC’s executive employee benefit plans, including equity-based plans, and is entitled to six weeks of paid vacation annually.

Mr. Hult’s employment agreement subjects Mr. Hult to the following restrictive covenants: (i) non-solicitation of employees of TWM LLC and non-interference with customers and clients of TWM LLC during employment and the Non-Solicitation Period; (ii) non-competition during employment and the President Non-Competition Period (as defined below); and (iii) perpetual non-disclosure of confidential

information. The “President Non-Competition Period” means (x) in the event of a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason, eighteen (18) months following termination; and (y) in the event of a termination for any other reason, twelve (12) months following termination. The definitions of “Cause” and “Good Reason” as defined in Mr. Hult’s employment agreement are described below under the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Each of Mr. Olesky and Mr. Hult’s employment agreements also provide for severance upon certain terminations of employment, as described below under the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Mr. Bruni - Managing Director, Head of Europe and Asia Business

Mr. Bruni is party to an employment agreement with TW Europe, dated as of November 27, 2002. Mr. Bruni’s employment agreement provides for base salary (to be reviewed annually), eligibility to participate in bonus schemes as determined by the Company, membership in the company’s contributory pension scheme, and membership in additional employee benefit plans. Mr. Bruni is entitled to four weeks’ notice prior to a termination without cause, plus an additional week’s notice for each year of employment in excess of two years, up to a maximum of 12 weeks’ notice. The company is permitted to make a payment of his basic salary in lieu of notice. Mr. Bruni is also subject to restrictive covenants in his equity award agreements granting him PRSUs and RSUs including non-competition and non-solicitation of clients and employees during the one-year period following his termination.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes the number of securities underlying the equity awards held by each of the NEOs as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table summarizes the option exercises and stock vested by each of the NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Severance under Employment Agreements

Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, each of Messrs. Olesky and Hult are entitled to receive certain payments in connection with certain termination events.

In the event that (i) Mr. Olesky or Mr. Hult is terminated by TWM LLC without Cause (as defined below), (ii) Mr. Olesky or Mr. Hult resigns for Good Reason (as defined below), or (iii) TWM LLC elects not to renew Mr. Olesky’s or Mr. Hult’s employment agreement prior to its expiration or any subsequent renewal term and Mr. Olesky or Mr. Hult’s employment agreement and Mr. Olesky’s or Mr. Hult’s employment is terminated, each of Mr. Olesky and Mr. Hult are entitled to the following: (A) continuation of their base salary for eighteen (18) months following termination, (B) the average annual bonus earned by the executive for the two calendar years ending immediately prior to the year of termination, payable in equal installments over eighteen (18) months, (C) a pro rata bonus for the year of termination based on actual TWM LLC performance for the year of termination, payable at the time when bonuses are otherwise paid, (D) (x) for Mr. Olesky, continuation of healthcare benefits provided by TWM LLC generally to its active senior executive officers, including employee contributions, until Mr. Olesky reaches age 65, or, if not permitted by applicable law, private health insurance on substantially similar terms and conditions, and (y) for Mr. Hult, continuation of the healthcare benefits for eighteen (18) months, and (E) any earned but unpaid base salary, accrued vacation pay and unreimbursed business expenses and other benefits payable in accordance with TWM LLC policies. Payment of the severance benefits described above is subject to each of Mr. Olesky’s and Mr. Hult’s continued compliance with the restrictive covenants included in the applicable employment agreement, and their execution of a release of claims.

In the event that Mr. Olesky’s employment ends by reason of his retirement, he will be entitled to continuation of healthcare benefits generally provided to senior executive officers, including employee contributions, until Mr. Olesky reaches age 65, or, if not permitted by applicable law, private health insurance on substantially similar terms and conditions.

For purposes of each of Messrs. Olesky and Hult’s employment agreements, “Cause” means any of the following that remains uncured (if curable) for ten (10) days after the executive’s receipt of written notice thereof from TWM LLC: (a) the executive has engaged in dishonesty, gross negligence or willful misconduct of more than a de minimis nature, in each case, with regard to TWM LLC that is demonstrably injurious to TWM LLC; (b) the executive has failed to attempt, in good faith, to substantially perform his duties with TWM LLC (other than as a result of the executive’s physical or mental incapacity); (c) the executive has failed to attempt, in good faith, to follow the lawful written direction of, for Mr. Olesky, the Board and for Mr. Hult, the Chief Executive Officer; or (d) the executive has been convicted of, or entered a plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony (other than as a result of vicarious liability or a traffic infraction).

For purposes of each of Messrs. Olesky and Hult’s employment agreements, “Good Reason” means any of the following that remains uncured (if curable) for ten (10) days after TWM LLC’s receipt of written notice thereof from the executive not later than 60 days following the later of the occurrence of the event or the date the executive should reasonably have knowledge thereof: (a) the executive is serving in a position below, for Mr. Olesky, Chief Executive Officer (or is not reporting directly to the Board) and for Mr. Hult, President; (b) a material diminution of the executive’s duties, responsibilities or authority or the assignment to the executive of duties or responsibilities that are materially adversely inconsistent with the executive’s then-position; (c) TWM LLC has reduced the executive’s annual salary or annual bonus target; (d) TWM LLC has required the executive to relocate his principal place of employment by more than fifty (50) miles; or (e) any material breach by TWM LLC of the employment agreement. In addition, for Mr. Olesky, “Good Reason”